Monday, July 16, 2007

I Am a Man

I am a man.

I saw an interview with Daniel Radcliffe the other day, and that's what he had to say to all those people who still think he's a cute little wizard.

I too am a man, and apparently it means a number of things.

For some, it means to be one of the last remaining hairy, muscled warrior kings without need for emotions or pity clenching a battle axe in your calloused hands at the ends of your scarred and bleeding forearms barking orders to your brethren as they join in conquest of the enemy in hopes of one day returning to your womenfolk and ravishing them so one day their 15 sons can go on to inherit your glory.

For others, it means being someone who works hard for a living, coming home sweaty on Friday and washing up with Lava before dressing in denim and driving your pickup to the local bar where you'll spend an evening tossing back beer, making fun of midgets, and discussing just what it is you like more - custom-built V10 racing lawnmowers, or women's Jello wrestling.

Still, for many it means high-fiving at a college football game and tanking up on cheap brew while slipping nips of Jagermeister between field goals before stumbling back to the frat house turning your visor sideways to better shoot a cell-phone video of some dumb brunette playing truth or dare in her underwear as Chumbawumba jostles the organs in your chest cavity.

Recently, a number of people think it means pausing your game of "Gears of War" to set the Tivo to record "The Science of Star Trek" and checking the progress of your torrent download of 10,000 photos of Jenna Jameson in action before you head out to the mailbox to collect the shipment from the seller on Ebay who promised you a mint "Sin City" Marv Bobble Head action figure with the rare misspelling on the packaging.

Guess what ladies? You think being a man is sad, depressing and gross.

We know, that's why we changed and/or hid our manliness for nearly two decades. But, then, suddenly it seems, something happened.

Perhaps you've noticed it. The backlash against sensitivity and feminine aesthetics over the last few years.

Men, it seems, are tired of being emasculated, and are seeking some form of release.

The first modern exploration of this was probably 1996's "Fight Club," and later the movie.

Chuck Pahluniuk wrote a book out of a desire to create some sort of place where men could be men. Other novels like "The Joy Luck Club," "How to Make an American Quilt," "Fried Green Tomatoes," "The Ya-Ya Sisterhood" and so on had created these tiny exclusionary groups where women could indulge in their womanhood, yet men had nothing other than video games and sports.

He saw a modern life where many of the attributes men bring to the table in an evolutionary sense were no longer valued. Aggression, physical strength, competitive drive, ribald sexual appetites are all frowned upon. Likewise, the things society suggested we were to aspire to - rock stars, movie stars, astronauts, tycoons and quarterbacks were largely unattainable goals.

"Fight Club" is about two generations of men who are living in the shadows of the manliest men who ever lived; The Greatest Generation laughs in their faces. Ghosts of fathers and grandfathers munch on cigars right behind you as your short, overweight douche of a boss tells you how it is.

He suggested deep within all men there is a yearning to return to a place where the things that make us male are important again, and the things that keep us in cubicles and hair salons are once again meaningless.

Of course, in the book and the movie, the result was a fascist dictatorship of sorts causing mayhem through terrorist acts and violence. The duality of man is a harsh and ugly truth.

"Fight Club" often ends up in user-voted top ten lists for best movies of all time. The book is passed around and read by men who barely skim sports pages. Men dig it because just about every one of us would end up in a fight club if we had the chance, or at least we like to believe we would. Why, you might ask?

If you are a woman, I highly recommend you go and get a shot of testosterone (yes, you can actually do this) and get a taste of what it's like being a man. Some women who do this report unfathomable horniness, uncontrollable aggression, and a sudden and deep desire to eat the raw flesh of the noble elk.

Ladies, imagine the horniest you have ever been, multiply that by 17, and that's us every second of the day until we die. Add to this a hair-trigger temper that demands blood for transgressions on our honor, pride and possessions, along with a need to defeat anyone who challenges us in anything - be it nuclear war or table hockey - and that's us every second of the day.

Some men are able to keep all that manliness in check, pushing it down and denying it. Some can't. Either way - bars, stadiums, strip clubs and arcades act as refuges where the monster can roam free for a while before Dr. Jekyll is forced to put on his suit and act like an evolved human being again.

Consider the Real Doll. Men will have sex with a doll if it looks enough like a beautiful woman. Who wants to live like that? No one does, but we do what must with the brain we were given. Male Australian jewel beetles will mate with discarded brown beer bottles because the shape and texture resembles a female - a gigantic, yet irresistibly hot female. The circuitry is hard-wired to respond, and they do.



Biologists call Real Dolls and brown beer bottles supernormal releasers. When a normal stimulator of behavior gets exaggerated, sometimes it overwhelms you. The beetles fuck the bottles instead of actual females, and then they die without having passed on their genes or formed a mutual, lasting relationship based on respect. I promise you, men would love to be able to turn off our stupid, hyper sexual, hyper aggressive mind at will. Being a man means being in control. Being a man means not descending into a place where you engage in pseudonecrophilia with a lifeless automaton. For some, this is the only way they can cope. Without the doll, they might descend further still.

Advertising has caught on in a big way. Always roaming around in our collective unconscious, advertising geniuses recently discovered our emasculation and are using it to sell us all sorts of stupid shit.

Examples:















Oh, man oh man, I could fill the page with ads devoted to this. You get the point I'm sure. Men want to be men again, want to celebrate that which was once scorned, and they're willing to buy stuff in the name of being a man. Companies out to make a buck oblige by creating products designed to appeal to men. How can metal strips glued to a strip of plastic be gender specific?

But wait, there's another way to capitalize on this feeling of emasculation, sell people a chance to reclaim their manhood. Wow, does the military love this. You'll find Navy ads with rock and roll, Marines ads with men climbing cliffs, and the worst, Army ads with young men playing videogames and being taunted by real soldiers. "Hey, pussies. Want to be real man? Then put down that remote and stand up straight. Wipe the Cheeto crumbs off your shirt and call a recruiter!"



Seriously? No one sits there playing "Halo" thinking, "You know, the only thing that would make this better would to be the sensation of the actual blood of my friends being sprayed into my eyes and mouth."

They relentlessly play these recruitment commercials during "The Daily Show," "Adult Swim" and "Attack of The Show." They know who they're after. Hell, why do you think there's a cable network devoted to men? Spike is just capitalism at work. Target demographic acquired, launch "Girls Gone Wild."

But, far worse than the Army of One campaign and the Army Strong campaign, both designed to make you feel as if taking orders somehow makes you a stronger individual, are the Strength for Now, Strength for Later ads.

In one, a skinny, chiseled-face man wearing a uniform and a beret walks up to a group of old buddies; they all yell and slap each other welcoming him home. One asks, "So, what did you do?"
He looks into his old friend's eyes, his steely glare piercing the very heart of his inquisitor. He's thinking how naive and soft these guys are. He's thinking, Jesus, was I once like them?

"Computers, mostly," he replies. No need to go into details. They wouldn't understand. These sorry excuses for men should just go castrate themselves right now and look over some sultan's harem. What pathetic dipshits. Why did I even come back?

His high-school buddy, who probably still reads comic books and plays with dolls - puke - timidly moves closer.

"But, couldn't you have just done that here?"

Suddenly the once boy soldier's mind explodes into shards of flashbacks, and the smell of cordite and fear fills his nostrils. He's back in a tent, surrounded by laptops, the sound of battle rages outside. He's yelling, "Quick, hit control, alt and delete. No, you fool! Simultaneously! Move out of the way!"

The soldier turns his head, his jaw clenching so hard his teeth might buckle, and says, "Not really."

I assume he stands up after that, does an about face, then walks out of the room and into his cab. Later, on the base, he fires up "World of Warcraft" and laughs in the face of danger.

The other ad, which leads me into the other side of this emasculation phenomenon, features a pudgy dad sitting at a coffeehouse in the middle of the night. Outside rain is sheeting down. A train in the distance moves away. Sitting beside him is his son, dressed sharply in a uniform, his face clean and his posture correct.

The dad's gravel crunching voice comes up slow and steady, "You're a changed man."

The son, unflinching, returns, "How's that?"

"Back there, when you got off the train," the father looks away, "you did two things you've never done before at the same time."

He pauses. Is he really going to admit this?

"You shook my hand, and you looked me square in the eye."

The dad looks back into the face of his son who peers right back, his body a statue, his neck filled with tightened cords of steel. He smirks.

I assume the very next second the son stands up, looks down on the man he once feared, the man who used to beat him as slobber tinged with the tang of bourbon dribbled out of his yellowed teeth onto the carpet right before he stumbled off to enjoy violent maritals with his sobbing mothe; he looks at that same man, now so small and hollow, and tells him, "I have a ride. I just wanted to meet you here and say one thing."

"What's that?"

"Fuck you."

You see, advertising is a the canary in the coal mine of American culture. People with something to sell or something to gain who have the money to spend do everything they can to keep up with the rapidly shifting psyche of their targets. When you start to see a trend, there's always a good reason for it. The Army knows what their selling, and they only need to sell it once per customer.

The Devry and ITT-Tech commercials, aimed at the same people and aired with the same programs, show people who were in dead-end jobs and had no girlfriends who, after going to Devry Technical Institute not only get a decent job, but also get to have sex with real women. Every Devry student graduates with a degree and his father's respect.

So, it isn't just The Man Show and Maxim magazine profiting from this need to be hairy. Stuff, FHM, "300", Jackass - all of it is the result of people profiting on the woe that is modern man's realization. We are no longer needed. RISE UP!

Don't get me wrong here. I understand the problem. Men don't have wombs, and wombs can seriously get in the way of acting a fool until you're 50. Men can be boys forever if they play their cards right. Most of us act like 16-year-olds as soon as no one is looking. Before the birth-control pill, we had free reign of the Earth. All the institutions and governments, all the science and technology - men kept women out of the loop. Women entered the workforce, academia and politics without looking back, and it has taken a lot of struggle to get to where women are today - which is far from perfect.

I think somewhere in the late '80s, and early '90s, there was a push to embrace femininity, to get in touch, to wear sweaters. It was doomed from the beginning. Men may be subject to devolution, but it isn't going to just fizzle out. That's too bad in many ways. Holocausts and wars are certainly the domain of men, not women.

Charlie LeDuff, an inspiration and among my favorite journalists and authors, recently tapped into all of this in a new book, "Us Guys."

LeDuff is in search of the American male. He finds a lot of men in the Heartland wandering aimlessly through life, boozing it up, drifting into old age with nothing but regret. All the dragons are dead, it seems.

A final note. Thanks to Match.com and other online dating sites, a great deal of information has been gathered about what it takes for a woman to look at a man's profile, dig deeper, decide to share information with him and eventually meet.

If you love evolutionary psychology like myself, then you already knew certain things would be revealed by the data. According to the book Freakonomics, women are far less concerned about looks and far more concerned about income than are men. But, what's interesting for the sake of this blog entry, is how women tend to gravitate toward a very specific group of men who don't earn big money. Soldiers, firemen and police officers get a lot more action in the world of online dating than do men who make a comparable amount of money. In fact, those men in uniform do just as well as wealthy businessmen and other professionals. Women tend to avoid students, actors and waiters. Also, you can be overweight, but not short.

What does that say? It says women want men to be men as much as men do. Of course, according to those same statistics, men find blond hair more attractive than college degrees.

To be a man means rising above your animal instincts and embracing humanity. It means having integrity, courage, honesty and accountability. But, it seems, at least for next few hundred years, a balance must be achieved. Because as much as I love poetry and dandelions, I still wouldn't mind being allowed once in a while to run at full speed through the highlands with a battle axe in hand.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button









8 Comments:

Blogger Elizabeth said...

Man, it's hard for me to sort out my responses to this.

One is, dude! the ENTIRE WORLD has been an exclusive men's club for 10,000 years! In the last couple decades women have declared themselves human and formed exclusive clubs and now men are whining because they aren't wanted there? Boo. Hoo.

Another reaction is, thank you for reminding me why I never want to get married or live with a man ever again. Possibly never have a boyfriend again. They're too scary, and they all resent us, secretly or openly. Being with a man is dangerous.

Another: "emasculation". Oh, gosh. Guys, we're sorry. We asked you to grow up, and start treating us like human beings, and stop trying to kill or fuck everything that walked past you, so that we could perhaps not live in fear of you anymore. How unreasonable of us. Here, you can have your balls back now. The experiment wasn't working anyway. We should have known: MEN can't be TAMED! (Cue impressive music.)

Another: Yes, women want men to be Men. This is not to say that we want men to destroy everything around them, including us. We know the difference between being a man and being a violent jackhole. After a million years, guys apparently still haven't figured it out.

I'm trying to feel some sympathy, but I just can't. Look at the history of the human race and tell me that men have EVER been oppressed anywhere for just being men.

July 16, 2007 6:30 PM  
Blogger David McRaney said...

Hey, I certainly make no claims of oppression.

I'm just noticing a social trend, nothing more.

July 16, 2007 7:08 PM  
Blogger Sharkbait said...

This is a most excellent post. I've wondered about these trends for years. Thanks for laying it down with great examples, insights, humor, and most importantly, a man's ferociously sexy grip (I originally wrote "touch", but that didn't seem right AT ALL).

July 17, 2007 12:26 AM  
Blogger Kate said...

Re: Elizabeth--I certainly agree that overly aggressive men are jackholes and they've pretty much run the world since the dawn of time, but the point I think David is trying to make is not a Men vs. Women one, but a men vs. Men one. Wanting to unleash a barbaric yalp doesn't mean that it has to be AT anyone in particular. Maybe that's ignoring part of the nature of aggression, but hopefully these new Men-men have evolved enough to know that it's fun to run thorough the fields with a battle axe, but maybe not hit anyone with it. Evolution, right? Isn't that why someone invented paintball?
Frankly, I'm all for manly men and I'm tired or these overly cerebral hipster boys in major urban centers who don't want to oppress me by buying me a beer. What happened to impressing me? How else are you going to get me to let you club me over the head? Thanks to women's lib, I'll buy the next round, which is fine by me.
With the (re-)rise of manly men comes the rise of manly women, too, and I don't mean butch lesbians. Some of us like to be aggressive, have high pressure jobs, and want to watch football. We can like poetry and dandelions, too. And so can men. I know chemistry and wombs have a lot to do with the expression of those characteristics, but I don't think David here is whining about not being in charge anymore. Or if he is, he's whining about being in charge of expressing himself in the way he'd like. Clubbing a woman over the head? Bad, of course. But drinking beer with your buds? Who cares? The true power of being a woman around men who cannot control their testosterone (I'm not talking about rapists and wife-beaters here) is that we get to chose if we want to be around them when they're being insufferable and have plenty of other things to do when they are. Guys don't want to sit around while I watch DeGrassi: The Next Generation reruns, so that's fair, right?
But maybe I'm just bitter because I like football and NONE of the guys I know will watch it with me. What gives? Thankfully, I'm happy in front of the TV on a Saturday afternoon (college ball, of course) with a cold one all by myself. I'll meet up with Joe Hipster at the art gallery later.

July 18, 2007 11:56 AM  
Blogger David McRaney said...

Thanks, Kate. That is EXACTLY the point.

July 18, 2007 12:51 PM  
Anonymous Wil said...

david david david!!!!!!

i can't express my gratitude in text

i feel so sad because i just want to give you a big hug

i've felt like a lone ranger on this topic

i'm getting all sporadic because i'm overcome with the experience of finding someone of mutual opinion

THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!1

thank you david thank you.

and elizabeth, you are entitled to your opinion. may i remind you that the reason i am a man is because of my biology, not my choice. that should clear a lot up i think, as you write as though you think i choose to behave like i'm pumped full of testosterone. the way you communicate is like those people who think being homosexual is a choice.

well screw you for your lack of broadmindedness, and your idiotic feminist elitism.

yes, elizabeth, being with a man IS DANGEROUS! thank goodness!!!!! why? omg, DO YOU REALLY WANT ME TO EXPLAIN THAT?!!! you have got to be kidding me. you are living in an illusion where you think the impact of our biology on our thinking and behaviour does not count. how delusional. i think an account of this fact you will find palatable is

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Female_Brain

also elizabeth, you contradict yourself at the end in saying that women want men to be men, after getting angry at men for almost your entire post. that you expected us to buy this inconsistency reminds me of how so many people writing from a feminist perspective appear to have such shoddy standards because they think feminism is sacred, immune to the touch of critical thinking, and therefore any crap they shovel in is protected from the disrespect it deserves.

well let me in on a little secret about what you wrote. you seemed to confuse men with violent people. you spent most of the post insinuating that men have an bottomless appetite for irrational brutal violence. what non anecdotal evidence do you have to back this up? don't even think about getting back to me until you have some.

get out of here with your disgusting slurs against the integrity of men.

your post could have been a good one against people with an appetite for indiscriminate violence, but it was a prejudiced one putting forth the unsubstantiated claim that only men have this.

so, once again, screw you.

ok, enough indignation now. *phew*

david, i'm so glad you had kate to back u up until now.

i'm also so glad to find an intelligent post about the meaning of 300, a movie which stirred me into a bit of a frenzy on my livejournal:

http://rednorth.livejournal.com/100328.html?mode=reply

david i really appreciate what you write and i love how you seem to communicate an experience of loving what you are doing. this really came out for me in the collection of man ads. omg HOW AWESOME WAS THE GERMAN REXONA ONE!!!!!

July 24, 2007 5:04 AM  
Blogger Matt said...

seriously a great article. screw the naysayers, you sir, are an independent thinker who has stepped back and pinpointed something that has been rolling around in my aware subconscious for a long time.

elizabeth is clearly a man-hater. that kind of girl is the same reason i'll never date a femi-nazi again. :)

"They're too scary, and they all resent us, secretly or openly. Being with a man is dangerous." I love it, classic quote.

July 25, 2007 12:02 PM  
Anonymous tia said...

Thanks, Kate, you articulated my own opinion far better that i could myself.
Running around with an ax sounds like fun right about now.

August 15, 2007 5:12 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home